Monday, July 9, 2018

Mind & Happiness 52




Since our Mind & Body are not natural to us, we can never feel completely at ease or happy with either of them, or with any of the Material, Sensual, Mental, Intellectual, or Emotional pleasures that we may enjoy through them.  Why should we think that Happiness is our Natural State, & that un-happiness is something unnatural to us ?  If our True Nature is really Happiness, why do we not feel perfectly happy at all Times ?  How does un-happiness arise ?

We can understand this by critically analyzing our experience of our 3 States of Consciousness, Waking, Dream & Deep Dreamless Sleep.  In our Waking & Dream states we experience a mixture of pleasure & pain, or Happiness & un-happiness.  But what do we experience in Deep Dreamless Sleep, when this mixture of Pleasure & Pain is removed ?  In the absence of this mixture, do we experience Happiness or un-happiness ?   In the state of Deep Dreamless Sleep, do we not feel perfectly happy, & free from all misery or un-happiness ?  Is it not clear therefore that neither un-happiness, nor a mixture of Happiness & un-happiness, is natural to us? Since we can exist in the absence of un-happiness, it cannot be our Real Nature.  Un-happiness is merely a negation of Happiness, which is natural to us.

If un-happiness cannot be our Real Nature because we can exist in its absence, can we not say the same about Happiness ?  When we are unhappy, are we not existing in the absence of Happiness ?  No, Happiness is something that is never entirely absent.  Un-happiness is a relative state, one which exists relative only to Happiness.  Without the underlying existence of Happiness, there would be no such thing as un-happiness.  We feel unhappy only because we desire to be happy.  If Happiness were ever to become absolutely non-existent, we would not feel any desire for it, & hence we would not feel unhappy.  Even in a state of the most intense un-happiness, Happiness still exists as something for which we feel desire.  There is therefore no such thing as "absolute un-happiness".

If un-happiness is something that is merely relative, can we not say the same about Happiness ?  Is not Happiness also a relative state, one which exists relative only to un-happiness ?  The Happiness that we experience in Waking & Dream is certainly relative, & is therefore always incomplete or imperfect.  But can we say the same about the Happiness that we experience in Deep Dreamless Sleep  ?  Does the Happiness of Deep Dreamless Sleep exist relative only to un-happiness ?

No, in Deep Dreamless Sleep un-happiness is totally absent. When we are Deep Dreamless Sleep, un-happiness does not exist even as a thought, or as something that we fear or desire to avoid. Therefore, since un-happiness cannot exist without a desire for Happiness, but Happiness can exist without even the slightest notion of un-happiness, un-happiness is entirely relative, whereas Happiness may be either relative or Absolute.

The above themes & 2500 pages more are freely available as perused or downloaded PDF’s, the sole occupants of a Public Microsoft Skydrive “Public Folder” accessible through  www.jpstiga.com 

short-cut: http://sdrv.ms/YPOgkX or http://tinyurl.com/nnyyr58  link directly to free E-book PDF files



Different blogs available on:

jstiga.wordpress.com/

"There is no Creation, no Destruction, no Bondage, no longing to be freed from Bondage, no striving for Liberation, nor anyone who has attained Liberation. Know that this to be Ultimate Truth."

–  the "no creation" school of Gaudapada, Shankara, Ramana, Nome – Ajata Vada

 for very succinct summary of the teaching & practice, see:  www.ajatavada.com/

Saturday, July 7, 2018

Remove the Reference



When we speak of an object as if it were at some Coordinate Point in Space, we conveniently defined "that" or "this" [Idam] in terms of a central Reference Origin with that subject at Coordinates (0, 0, 0).  This (0, 0, 0) Reference is the subject in Dualism, a subject which defines & is defined by the object in a given Perception.

But this Dualistic subject ["I" –  aham] is actually only a subtler kind of object, an imaginary entity known as Ego, said to flit ghostlike "in front" of the True Self, Pure Consciousness, as an assumption deriving from the mis-identification: "I am the Body."  This Ego seems to support, & is supported by further derivative concepts, such as the mis-identifications: "I am the Mind", "I am in a World", I seek Pleasure & avoid Pain, I am of this gender, age, social class, point in the history of Time, located at this point in the Universe, with this life-time, with these desires, these fears, & the entire false Personality clustered around that central Reference Origin, the Ego.

Release of every personal tendency, [vasana]; release of every mis-identification, & so on, these "negations", these acts of Detachment –  they lead to Ego–loss which is concomitant with Liberation, Enlightenment.

As in an earlier blog, we find that removal of the Reference Origin Ego eliminates the underpinning, the definition of every object, of the Universe itself. The Non-Dual, Pure Consciousness that remains is ever–free, & always was.  The Reference Ego never truly existed.  But to the extent that the Ego, the mis-identification, "I am the Body" seems to continue, then reduction & elimination of that Ego Personal mis-identification is the goal of Spiritual Practice.

The Self-Inquiry "Who am I ?", as taught by Sri Ramana Maharshi, is the foremost & final measure to be taken, the universal method of Awakening.

Friday, July 6, 2018

Lollipop Trees


It is no exaggeration to say that the "World" we see in front of us is no more real than a child's crayon–drawing of a landscape with Lollipop Trees.  These Lollipop Trees as they are called in one idiom, with "sticks" of brown to represent each tree trunk, topped by a swatch of somewhat circular green crayon to represent the massive leaves.  Like a green Lollipop, such as simple symbol is called a Lollipop Tree.

No one takes such to be a literal rendition of a tree, but most can recognize the intended object of this depiction. Well, on a more complex & sophisticated level, our entire Perception of the outside World is like that Lollipop Tree, only a little bit more complicated. When physiologists of Perception pin down what amounts to an image on the Retina, they find it to be a muddy, swirly "motion picture" rather than a crisp clear photographic image. Such is transmitted somehow along the Optic nerves to the Brain & somehow to the Mind, whatever that is, interpreted into a crisp clear "Koda-chrome" photo, or motion picture.

How can this be so ?  Backing up a bit, we can look at some classic experiments in the Physiology of Perception.  Our eyes invert the image of the World in front of us & our Brain re-inverts it into it back into a right–side–up World.  When (foolish) volunteers fearlessly agree, for a small amount of research payment, to wear lenses that invert the World in front of them, researchers find that the mind can adapt to this.  They actually start to see the World right–side again, even up through these inverting lenses.  Wearing these for a short time, & then having the glasses removed, the subjects find an upside–down World in front of their eyes.

But then after a certain amount of time, some days or so, the Mind re-inverts the World again & everything is back to normal, hopefully, thankfully.  So it is with the muddy "motion pictures" focused on the Retina, & all the missing information that the mind fills–in [Blind–Spot Black–experiment]*.  

In fact, comparing the amount of information taken in by the Senses, that transmitted to the Brain & the image we seem to experience, some of the following basics seem to apply:

(1)  The "outside" it is far too vast to be taken in to any large degree.  Only a fraction is taken in.  

(2)  Of that which is taken in, not enough remains to make a clear image. The Mind uses customary expectations & "fills–in", the empty spaces with what is expected.  

(3)  In the end, between inversion, attribution of colors, & "filling–in", the Mind very much "creates" the perceived image – vision, sound, touch, etc. –  that we take to be an objective outside World.

(4)  In fact it can be truly said, that we have no idea what the outside World would really seem to be, or if there is even is an outside World.

Fast-forward to the Copenhagen–Convention of Quantum Mechanics in the early 20th Century.  Double–Slit experiments, Delayed Double–Slit, & so on, all point to an amazing conclusion. The Intention, Perception, & Consciousness of the experimenter has an influence on the basic Quantum phenomena observed & recorded.  Somehow Consciousness seem to come in to the apparent unfolding of the World.  This leads those Copenhagen–Convention of Quantum Mechanics or Quantum Physics to propose that the World is Consciousness, a "Quantum Idealism", as it were.

All this is later rejected in the mid-20th Century by the on-slaught, or on-swell of predominant Mechanistic Atheism, characterizing 90+% of Physical Scientists.  Philosophers comes shortly behind with some 85% dedication to complete Mechanistic Atheism.  With the "Consciousness–created" Reality of the Copenhagen Convention in the Quantum World pushed aside, many other mysteries of the Universe & our Perception of it are similarly pushed aside.

To preserve that Atheism, a fantastic 10500 – fold Mechanistic Multi-Universe is hypothesized &, by the majority, attested to, as the most quote "plausible" explanation. But the original Quantum Idealist would say that, at best, the Universe perceived is sketched out in Lollipop Trees, so to speak.  If the Universe is there at all, Bishop George Berkeley continued Descartes's BIV, "Brain-in-a-Vat" & Plato's Cave–Allegory to the declaration that: the World is in the Mind.

At first, officially backing off, if only to retain his religious pay-check, the Bishop in later life reverted & fully admitted his conviction that indeed the World is in the Mind. Contemporary Turkish publisher Harun Yahya & many other unlikely compatriots throughout the ages & throughout the continents have chimed in with Bishop Berkeley.

But following Analytical Philosophy, the Idealism of the 19th Century Europe was pretty much stomped into oblivion, even before Quantum Idealism's attempted revival. Advaita Vedanta takes up a different tack, by direct, inner, subjective experience & unmistakable agreement across many cultures, many continents, thousands of sages, men & women, that: indeed the World is in the Mind.  And that Mind itself is in Consciousness, & that Consciousness is the Universe.

So we live among the Lollipop Trees, content that this is a "real" World, like the apparent "reality" of every lucid nightly Dream.  But as Dreams follow each other in the course of an evening, so are life-times said to follow each other in the course of "Re-incarnation".  Such is the approximate Qualified Non-Dual view of Reality.  In the Un-Qualified Non-Dual view, even this Dream / Re-incarnation picture is itself only a Dream.  None of it stands as Real, alongside of Consciousness.

Instead of a World & oneself, there is only One Self.  Instead of oneself & millions of others there is only One Self.  This is not a "Solipsism" of an Individual.  This is an Over–Mind if you will, but actually an Over–Consciousness, far more subjective than the Mind.

The Mind is made up of images & words & symbols, illumined by the light of Consciousness.   Those images & words & symbols are but effervescent & momentary. Consciousness is steady, Eternal, Un-changing, & Un-limited.  A good name for this Non-Dual Reality "God" or in other languages Brahman, the Buddha–Mind, the Tao, the "First Principle" of the Eleatic Greek Sages, the "Godhead" of Meister Eckhart, & so on.

So ours is a choice, to live among the Lollipop Trees as another Lollipop, or to claim our peerless, Un-changing, Unborn, & Everlasting Freedom as Consciousness.  The shift in "perspective", if it can be lowered to such a depiction, is well worth the effort, even if that effort should seem to be long-lasting.  For the result is the inner, subjective, Un-limited Happiness.  That is the same as the Consciousness & is the actual Existence of oneself.

When I assure myself that I exist, I also notice that I know that I exist so Existence & Knowledge / Consciousness are one.  That same inner depth is where Love, Happiness, Joy, & Peace are ever found.  They actually never waver, even if our focus on them does waver, only to finally rest unceasingly there as Consciousness–Bliss, as Existence itself.  This is to escape the child–"World" of Lollipop Trees & rest in Reality.  This is Enlightenment, Liberation, Heaven.

*  Many have experienced, & anyone can "Google", the "Blind–Spot Black–Dot experiment.  Directed to the Optic Nerve connection blind–spot on the retina, any "black-dot", or any other detail, will be replaced by an assumed continuation of the background, be that white–space, floral–wallpaper, or whatever it might be.

Thursday, July 5, 2018

TOE, Theory of Everything - ch. 1 H


The above themes & 2500 pages more are freely available as perused or downloaded PDF’s, the sole occupants of a Public Microsoft Skydrive “Public Folder” accessible through  www.jpstiga.com 

short-cut: http://sdrv.ms/YPOgkX or http://tinyurl.com/nnyyr58  link directly to free E-book PDF files



Different blogs available on:

jstiga.wordpress.com/

"There is no Creation, no Destruction, no Bondage, no longing to be freed from Bondage, no striving for Liberation, nor anyone who has attained Liberation. Know that this to be Ultimate Truth."


–  the "no creation" school of Gaudapada, Shankara, Ramana, Nome – Ajata Vada


 for very succinct summary of the teaching & practice, see:  www.ajatavada.com/

Wednesday, July 4, 2018

TOE, Theory of Everything - ch. 1 G



The above themes & 2500 pages more are freely available as perused or downloaded PDF’s, the sole occupants of a Public Microsoft Skydrive “Public Folder” accessible through  www.jpstiga.com 

short-cut: http://sdrv.ms/YPOgkX or http://tinyurl.com/nnyyr58  link directly to free E-book PDF files



Different blogs available on:

jstiga.wordpress.com/

"There is no Creation, no Destruction, no Bondage, no longing to be freed from Bondage, no striving for Liberation, nor anyone who has attained Liberation. Know that this to be Ultimate Truth."


–  the "no creation" school of Gaudapada, Shankara, Ramana, Nome – Ajata Vada

 for very succinct summary of the teaching & practice, see:  www.ajatavada.com/

Tuesday, July 3, 2018

Contemplating Consciousness

                                                                                                     Sage Ramana Maharshi

At the risk of leaning on an old movie, weekend playfully or at least less seriously begin by re-examining some pop media statements that from the outset were incompletely digested by the public, and perhaps even by the writers and producers so inspired.

Wake up Neo, the Matrix has you. 

The Matrix really does have you.  It has to blinded to reality, & loss in a Dream World. But just what is this "Matrix" ?  Of course, then that the Latin for "mother", the Matrix could be seen as the "Divine Mother", Maya, & more intimately or personally, the Mind.

The Matrix is everything that you see.

"Real" ?  How do you determine what is Real ?  What you perceive, you know only as electrical impulses in your Brain.

This Senate the great forward thrust of the movies inquiry into the truth. And yet it is also the endpoint because the same process of examination is not reflected back onto the nerve impulses themselves. How are they known. The brain the body and all the nerve impulses are known to Vision, direct or in the media, & reading, the words of others: hearing, especially as it hearing from others; & so on.  

And so, Perception must be put under the same light as the external objects perceived –  Perception itself & all of its components or objects.  But objects of, to, or for what ? 

Well, Consciousness of course, if Consciousness be taken as more fundamental than mere nerve impulses.  Consciousness then is direct knowing, at the endpoint of every the Perceptual or Conceptual process.

No one can tell you what the Matrix is, you must discover it for yourself.

You are living in a Dream World, Neo.

To whatever degree the writers & the producers fully understood their own script lines, these popular yet mysterious statements hinted strongly at the Reality known to the wisest in India, Tibet, China, Japan, & to some degree in Greek colonies among certain Philosophers, & to a few Christian mystics such as Meister Eckhart.

In short Reality is purely subjective & purely unitary. There is only One Consciousness, with the appearance of multiple individuals being a double vision multiplied billions of times. The Waking State Body is not in principle any different than the Dream Body in each Dream.

The Reality is not personal, not individual, Immortal, ever–free, all–loving, & inherently completely blissful. In the life of an ordinary man, the most subjective experiences include the inherent certainty of his own Existence. Part of this recognition is the recognition of Consciousness itself by which that or anything could be known.

And finally sporadic throughout life, seemingly temporary experiences of Love & Happiness are also deeply subjective.  In the Matrix movie we hear:

Being "the One" is like falling in love.  No one can tell you that you are or that you are not, but you know it through & through. These 3 then: Existence, Consciousness, & happiness – bless – love these are what have long been indicated as Sat–Chit–Ananda, Existence–Consciousness–Bliss. These are the subjective reality, not 3, but 1, seen from 3 different perspectives.  

By the time we study the apparent phenomena of objective things, we do well to pay attention to Cognitive Sciences & to Quantum Mechanics where the issue of Consciousness comes to the fore, however concealed within the Objective assumptions.  Any inspection of, attention given to: Consciousness, must be relatively worthwhile. No exact conclusion here should be expected.  But hints & indications, consistent with the underlying Subjective Reality could well be expected.

The above themes & 2500 pages more are freely available as perused or downloaded PDF’s, the sole occupants of a Public Microsoft Skydrive “Public Folder” accessible through  www.jpstiga.com 

short-cut: http://sdrv.ms/YPOgkX or http://tinyurl.com/nnyyr58  link directly to free E-book PDF files



Different blogs available on:

jstiga.wordpress.com/


"There is no Creation, no Destruction, no Bondage, no longing to be freed from Bondage, no striving for Liberation, nor anyone who has attained Liberation. Know that this to be Ultimate Truth."


–  the "no creation" school of Gaudapada, Shankara, Ramana, Nome – Ajata Vada

 for very succinct summary of the teaching & practice, see:  www.ajatavada.com/

Sunday, July 1, 2018

TOE, Theory of Everything - ch. 1 F






The above themes & 2500 pages more are freely available as perused or downloaded PDF’s, the sole occupants of a Public Microsoft Skydrive “Public Folder” accessible through  www.jpstiga.com 

short-cut: http://sdrv.ms/YPOgkX or http://tinyurl.com/nnyyr58  link directly to free E-book PDF files




Different blogs available on:

jstiga.wordpress.com/



"There is no Creation, no Destruction, no Bondage, no longing to be freed from Bondage, no striving for Liberation, nor anyone who has attained Liberation. Know that this to be Ultimate Truth."

–  the "no creation" school of Gaudapada, Shankara, Ramana, Nome – Ajata Vada

 for very succinct summary of the teaching & practice, see:  www.ajatavada.com/